In article buckmr@rs6419.ecs.rpi.edu (Ron Buckmire) writes: >rcrice@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (roger.w.crice) writes: > >>A short while ago, Cincinnati City Council PASSED the >>Human Rights Ordinance that prohibits discrimination >>in housing and employment on the basis of sexual >>orientation (among other criterion). >Congratulations! > >>The ordinance allowed for a couple of exceptions, >>including religious organizations, businesses with >>fewer than 10 employees, state and federal jobs Add to that list fraternal organizations. It does, however, apply to hotels, restaurants (and we do have Crapper Barrels here), labor organizations, etc. >>(I think - when I get an approved copy of the >>measure I will post it here). >Cool. > >>A few council members dissented, but I lost track of >>who voted which way. A majority of votes was all that >>was required to pass the measure. >Can't really disseminate the information without at >least a preliminary count on what the votes were like. It was a 7-2 vote; Nick Vehr and David Mann (D, U.S. Rep- representative-elect) were the dissenters. The measure went into effect immediately. >Also, what abaout that businessman who said that he will >mount a repeal effort by referendum next year? Besides councilmember Vehr? Well, there's Charles Winburn, policy director for a group that calls itself New Wave 2000, a coalition spearheading the fight against the ordinance. I don't know if he's a businessman or religious leader - but I'll probably find out soon. Here's what the Cincinnati Post had to say about the effort to repeal the ordinance (ordinarily, I cannot stomach the local papers, but we entertained my husband's family for Thanksgiving, and I find that $.35 is a good investment to keep my father-in-law occupied while the rest of us occupy the kitchen. What timing!): Winburn and others in the coalition, such as Citizens for Community Values [of the Mapple- thorpe snafu -rwc] and the Baptist Ministers Conference, say they will target those members of the council who voted for the ordinance during next November's election. And they say they are already launching an attack--at the state and local level--to get this ordi- nance and others similar to it outlawed [Columbus, OH, has had a sexual orientation non-discrimination law for some time now; Cincinnati extended protections to lesbian and gay *city* employees more than a year ago. -rwc]. The local tactic will be a referendum to repeal the council's action, which would take 9,775 signitures to get on the ballot. CCV officials say they will also launch a statewide ballot issue that would outlaw similar ordinances across the state. While I had much to be thankful for at Thanksgiving, I have no doubt that we will see here in Ohio the same fight that Colorado and also Oregon went through. Roger Crice, Recovering Baptist Cincinnati, Ohio.