Date: Wed, 11 Sep 96 14:23:43 EDT From: aleonard@counsel.com (Arthur S Leonard -- New York Law School - New York ) Subject: *QL*: elections To: queerlaw, Inet Yesterday was Democratic primary day in New York, and four openly lesbian or gay attorneys were running in contested primaries for judicial positions. In the most publicized race, Karen Burstein, narrowly defeated for State Attorney General, ran this year for a seat on Manhattan's Surrogate Court, which has jurisdiction over trusts and estates cases and some family law cases. By running for this position, Burstein, who claimed to be mounting a "reform" campaign, was running against both the party establishment and the reform elements in the Democratic Party in Manhattan, who have an understanding that incumbent judges who are rated as qualified for re-election by the party's screening panel should not be required to run in contested primaries. In this case, Renee Roth, the incumbent surrogate who is seeking re-election, was found well-qualified by the party's screening panel and by just about every other evaluating body (including the Judiciary Committee of the Lesbian and Gay Law Association of Greater New York, which gave her a "highly qualified" rating). Roth is known as being sensitive to lesbian-gay issues; she has approved second-parent adoptions and has a good reputation in handling lesbian/gay estates cases. This was a difficult voting decision for people in the lesbian/gay community, but in yesterday's primary Roth won a decisive victory, with substantial gay support. (According to those in the know, Burstein did not do nearly as well as expected in heavily gay areas such as Greenwich Village.) Overall, Roth drew 56% of the vote. The three other races involving openly lesbian or gay candidates were for civil court. Paul Feinman appears to have won a razor-thin victory in Manhattan's 1st Civil Court District over non-lesbian but lesbian/gay friendly candidate Liz Shollenberger. With almost all the election districts reporting last night, Feinman had a lead of less than 200 votes out of more than 6,000 cast. Today WNYC-radio declared Feinman the winner, but absentee ballots have yet to be counted. Feinman would be the first openly gay man to win election to NYC Civil Court. (Previous gay men on the court were appointed to interim vacancies, beginning with Bill Thom in the mid-1980s.) Feinman was endorsed by the NY Times, which cited his presidency of the Lesbian/Gay Law Association of Greater NY has among his credentials for the position. In the 4th District, openly lesbian attorney Eileen A. Rakower pulled an upset victory over incumbent Jay Dankberg. She was undoubtedly helped by the NY Times' decision to take seriously the City Bar Association Judiciary Committee's refusal to find Dankberg qualified for renomination. Dankberg's demeanor on the bench has been the subject of considerable protest by trial attorneys. In the 9th District, openly lesbian attorney Sandra Russo was defeated by Arthur Birnbaum. Russo failed to win a qualified rating from the City Bar Association, and her opponent was endorsed by The Times. (Russo may be known to students of gay law as the domestic partner of Robin Young from the famous Steel v. Young lawsuit concerning child custody and visitation rights contested between a gay male sperm donor and a lesbian couple.) So, openly lesbian or gay judicial candidates in NYC seem to be 2 for 4 this primary season. Winning the Democratic judicial primary in Manhattan is usually tantamount to election. ***************************************************************************** * To subscribe to QUEERLAW, send mail to: majordomo@abacus.oxy.edu * * In the mail message, enter ONLY the words: subscribe queerlaw * * To unsubscribe to QUEERLAW, send mail to: majordomo@abacus.oxy.edu * * In the mail message, enter ONLY the words: unsubscribe queerlaw * * Words in the Subject: line are NOT processed! * * There is also a QUEERLAW-DIGEST mailing list available * ******************************************************************************