Chicago Tribune On the Law Column Chicago Tribune Knight-Ridder/Tribune Business News CHICAGO--Jan. 18--MILITARY GAY POLICY CHALLENGED IN SUIT: Linking the words "sexual harassment" with "military" these days virtually guarantees at least a fleeting image of the Tailhook sex scandal, with its gantlet of groping, drunken aviators. But allegations of sexual harassment in a far more subtle form in the Illinois Air National Guard have surfaced in a lawsuit filed in U.S. ( (Biz Wire, Inc.)) kes its most extreme diversion: Men, with the exception of presiding Judge Wayne Andersen, are nowhere to be seen. The plaintiff, the defendant and all of their attorneys are women. Sherill Homberg, a Joliet woman who worked as a recruiter in the Air National Guard's O'Hare office, alleges that her female superviser sexually harassed her and ultimately damaged her career when Homberg rejected her advances. She maintains that the woman, a master sergeant, repeatedly stared at her chest and eventually made sexual advances toward her when Homberg changed clothes in a locker room. Homberg has since been relieved of her duties as a recruiter. The case is even more unusual because Homberg's complaint rests on the equal protection clause. She is arguing that she has a disproportionate burden of proof - compared with a plaintiff charging heterosexual sexual harassment - because of the government's policy on homosexuals in the military. That "don't ask, don't tell" policy, she maintains, prevents a review of all the circumstances and effectively denies her any recourse. "This is an odd situation," said Diann Marselek, the assistant Illinois attorney general who, with the U.S. Department of Justice, is defending the case. "There have been other cases like this (same-sex sexual harassment) in our office, but this is the first with the military that I've ever heard of." Homberg is suing the Air Force and Department of Defense, as well as the Illinois Air National Guard and other officials. She is not seeking monetary damages outright, but instead asks for an end to the government's policy on homosexuals, as well as various other forms of equitable relief. Marselek has filed a motion to dismiss the case, claiming the state agency is immune from the charges and, as a military matter, the federal court lacks jurisdiction to hear the case. But Lisa Kane, Homberg's attorney, said the constitutional element should enable the case to withstand jurisdictional scrutiny. "The policies the military has to deal with homosexual sexual harassment are ineffective," Kane said. "This needs to be changed."