From gwyn@annwfn.indstate.edu Mon Oct 10 08:45:16 1994 Court Mulls Gay Dad's Rights Date: Thu, 6 Oct 94 ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) -- David K. North can visit his three daughters for several hours on the weekend, during the daytime only. No holidays, no overnight visits. That's because a judge doesn't believe the gay, HIV-positive North -- now living with his lover -- can be trusted to hide his homosexuality from his children. North's appeal of that 1993 ruling has given the Maryland Court of Special Appeals its first chance to decide whether homosexuality is a reason to limit the rights of an otherwise good parent. ``It's a very important question. We need more loving parents rather than fewer, and to disqualify a homosexual because of that status is a pretty outrageous thing to do,'' said Stuart Comstock-Gay, head of the American Civil Liberties Union in Maryland, which is helping represent North. North's former wife, Kathryn Dionne North, had sought to terminate his visitation rights completely after learning that her ex-husband, a former Baptist minister, is gay. Instead, a judge denied North overnight visits with the girls, ages 9, 6 and 3, letting him have unsupervised visits on Saturdays and Sundays. Mrs. North believes homosexuality is a sin and her children may contract the AIDS virus from their father, even though medical testimony made it clear that that is not possible with casual contact. ``I don't want them to be guinea pigs. I don't want my babies to die,'' Mrs. North said at the appeals court hearing Sept. 27. In 21 of 25 states where the issue has been decided at the appellate level, courts ruled that a parent's rights cannot be limited solely because he or she is homosexual and living with a lover, said Natalie H. Rees, a lawyer appointed by the appeals court to represent the girls. In June, the Virginia Supreme Court overturned a judge's ruling denying a lesbian custody of her son. The judge had ruled that being a lesbian made her an unfit mother. John Crockett, head of a gay fathers group in Baltimore, said a ruling against North ``would be frightfully harmful'' to gay parents, who often have problems with child custody and visitation. But James Joyner, Mrs. North's lawyer, said North's homosexuality wasn't the real issue. He argued that North had shown he wasn't trustworthy because he continued to have sex with his former wife after learning he was infected with the AIDS virus. North tested positive for the virus in 1991. He told his wife two months later but said he contracted the virus from heterosexual contact. North has not developed symptoms of AIDS. Mrs. North said she is tested regularly, and tests so far have been negative. North resigned as pastor of his church after telling his wife and moved in with a family friend, David York. Each learned only after sharing a house that the other man is gay and HIV-positive. Mrs. North allowed liberal visits until North told her in 1992 that he is gay and that he and York were involved in a relationship. One reason Circuit Judge Audrey Melbourne cited in limiting North's visitation rights was that he could not be trusted since he continued to have sex with his wife after learning he had the AIDS virus. ``The court finds that the defendant is not candid, is not responsible and is deceitful,'' Melbourne said. ``The court will therefore not trust defendant's promise not to display his homosexual lifestyle to the children.'' Gerald Solomon, one of North's lawyers, agreed it was wrong for North to continue having sex with his wife. But Solomon said North's ability to care for the children is all that matters in the pending dispute. And the lawyer noted that state social and mental health workers said North was a good father and the girls enjoyed their visits with him and York. Both agencies supported liberal visitation rights. North wants his daughters for overnight visits, holidays and vacations and said he would not do anything that might expose them to the virus. The former minister, who once preached that homosexuality is a sin, also wants to tell his children that he is gay and would like his former wife to join the discussion. ``But given her adamant feelings about the evils and abomination of homosexuality,'' he said, ``that's just not going to happen.''