Date: Wed, 24 May 95 10:26:37 HST KRON-TV SAN FRANCISCO HAS GREAT COVERAGE; MS. MAGAZINE REVIEWS SAME-SEX MARRIAGE KRON-TV in San Francisco devoted 10 minutes of the Monday night 6pm news to the BAEHR V. LEWIN case. The coverage was reported to me as being excellent: footage of Supreme Court Justice Burns quizzing Deputy Attorney General Sonia Faust on the discrimination against same-sex couples; footage of HERMP lawyer Dan Foley outlining the fairness and equal protection issue, footage of one of the three plaintiff couples (Pat Lagon and Joe Melilo). KRON's coverage continued Tuesday night, will continue tonight; I've not heard a report of Tuesday's coverage. KRON is preparing a major documentary. I'd like to thank those who emailed me the San Francisco Chronicle front-page article on BAEHR V. LEWIN. I've now seen the 4-color photo of plaintiffs Ninia Baehr and Genora Dancel---great photograph! The opening line, the mundane issue of naming life insurance benefits, set a very practical tone. Great writing! Ms. magazine of May/June 1995 has a six-page article with title ``Is Marriage The Answer?'', pages 86---91. The photographs include Pat and Joe (caption: Patrick Lagon (left) and Joe Melilo are among three same-sex couples suing the state of Hawaii for the right to marry.), Ninia and Genora (caption: Genora Dancel (left) and Ninia Baehr want to marry for personal reasons, but their challenge to Hawaii's marriage laws will have political fallout.), couples marrying at the 1993 march on Washington and an Austin, Texas couple registering as domestic partners. The large print ``set-asides'' are the following: Is Marriage The Answer? Domestic Partnership Activists Don't Think So by Barbara Findlen, executive editor of Ms. Advocates for domestic partnership argue that no rights or benefits should be based on marriage. Feminists have long criticized marriage as a place of oppression, danger and drudgery for women. Hawaii passed a law that explicitly defines marriage as being between a man and a woman. The body of the article is quite informative: it details the numerous, and different, domestic partnership rights available in some cities and from some employers. It also outlines the diverse principles of domestic partnership advocates, and it recognizes the bottom line: ``But domestic partnerships don't hold a candle to the entitlements that come with marriage'', which include ``the right to joint parenting, through birth and adoption; the right to file joint income tax returns; legal immigration and residency for partners from other countries; benefits such as annuities, pensions and Social Security for surviving partners; immunity from having to testify in court against a spouse.'' [p. 89-90] The article ends with a quote from NGLTF's (executive director) Melinda Paras: ``I think that we will end up with marriage and domestic partnership as simultaneously existing legal constructs. Marriage is a huge battle that will mostly be lost for a long time. In the meantime, domestic partnership practices are expanding and will become a much larger body of law and policy. By the time equality gets won universally, we'll be in a whole other place about the definition of family, and gay marriage may become almost irrelevant.'' In Hawaii, going for same-sex marriage may well bring domestic partnership rights: the legislature is definitely trying to screw up its courage to pass domestic partnership legislation. So far, they can't or won't, because ANY affirmative action towards gays and lesbians draws a fierce attack from the Radical Right. It's easier to do nothing and let the courts take the blame. However, the court case to obtain marriage is forcing the legislature to face the issue AND MAKES DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP THE MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD COMPROMISE. For those of us who followed California's efforts to pass a very humane, and minimalist, DP statute last year (with the combined forces of the elderly and GLBT communities)---only to have Wilson veto it--- having DP be the compromise position is already a major step forward. The current governor of Hawaii, Ben Cayetano, campaigned on a platform last fall which called for ALL marriages being made into domestic partnerships in the law and leaving the word marriage to the private use of churches. This is a radical, and welcome, position of full equality between same-sex and opposite-sex couples--- and entirely due to Ben (and not a platform committee). BUT, in private, Cayetano has made clear that he will act on his ideas ONLY AFTER SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS CREATED BY THE COURTS. So, HERMP is in the courts---fighting for full equality. And the Mormons are trying their damndest to be there against us. Best Regards, Tom Ramsey Secretary, Steering Committee Hawaii Equal Rights Marriage Project P.S. Donations to HERMP are needed, no matter how small. They are fully tax-deductible and should be sent to HERMP/GLCC, 1820 University Ave., Honolulu, HI 96822 [telephone 808/942-3737; fax 926-1000; main GLCC number 951-7000.] ****************************************************************************** To send a message to the entire list "marriage", email marriage@abacus.oxy.edu To contact the List Manager, email marriage-owner@abacus.oxy.edu. *******************************************************************************