Date: Fri, 13 Jan 95 22:05:01 HST From: ramsey@math.hawaii.edu FEDERAL JUDGE HAROLD FONG ISSUES PERMANENT INJUNCTION BARRING CHURCH REPRESENTATIVES FROM HAWAII'S COMMISSION ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND THE LAW On Monday, January 9, Judge Harold Fong held a second hearing on the complaint of two Honolulu fundamentalists against Hawaii's Commission on Sexual Orientation and the Law. Before Christmas, Judge Fong had issued a Temporary Restraining Order barring four religious representatives from the Commission and allowing the rest of the commission to continue its work. Judge Fong had barred two representatives of the Catholic Church and the Mormon Church, but permitted two American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) representatives to stay on the commission. The two Honolulu fundamentalists, one a Roman Catholic and the other an Assembly of God minister, renewed their attacks on the commission. They argued that the AFSC is so close to Quaker churches that it is really a religion (this argument has failed in many courts before, which have allowed tax money to be spent on selected YMCA programs, etc.). They attacked the appointment of two members from Hawaii's Civil Rights Commission, pointing out that Hawaii law bars anyone from being members of two state commissions. They attacked another part of Act 217, the act which created the Commission on Sexual Orientation and the Law. Specifically, Act 217 has a paragraph which explicitly permits churches to solemnize same-sex weddings without giving such marriages the force of law (this widespread practice is thought to be protected by freedom of religion anyway). The fundamentalists argued injury to their own religious freedom by this explicit permission to other churches! The Assistant Attorney General, Stephen Michaels, argued against each point well. In addition, he asked that this hearing constitute the full trial of this complaint and thus provide a final ruling for the complaint. At 4 p.m., Jan. 13, Judge Fong issued a 9 page ruling. The argument against allowing churches to solemnize same-sex weddings drew this remark: "The court finds plaintiffs' arguments baffling." On the issue of two commissioners serving on more than one commission, he ruled that it was a matter of state laws and not his jurisdiction. In oral remarks from the bench, he had commented favorably on Stephen Michaels argument that Act 217, having been passed after the law banning persons from serving on more than one commission simultaneously, superceded the earlier act. The judge fully granted Stephen Michaels' request that this hearing serve as the final trial of this complaint. The judge issued a Permanent Injunction, barring the representatives of the Catholic and Mormon churches from the commission, while keeping the AFSC commissioners and permitting the governor to appoint 4 replacement commissioners. Here is the final paragraph of his decision: "The court permanently enjoins the representatives from the Catholic Church diocese and the Church of Latter Day Saints from further participation on the commission. The commission may continue to meet provided that such meetings are permitted by its governing rules. All other requests for relief are either without merit or inappropriate for this court to consider for the reasons hereinabove noted." POLITICAL FALLOUT In the meantime, the barred commissioners have gone public with a letter to the Governor in which they ask him to call for the resignations of the other commissioners---thus abandoning the whole project of studying the discrimination caused by denying marriage licenses to same-sex couples. They have charged that the commission is now unbalanced, and no longer fulfills the legislative intention of representing a cross-section of the people of Hawaii. The continuation of the commission has now itself become a political issue---a convenient sideshow to the main event. The Hawaii Equal Rights Marriage Project (HERMP) supports the quick appointment of 4 replacement commissioners, and supports the continued work of the remaining quorum of 7 members. As long as the commission educates people and politicians as to the reality of discrimination, we feel that a useful dialogue is being maintained. We hope that the politicians agree! THE MAIN EVENT HERMP is scheduled to be in state Circuit Court in April, unless there is some postponement. There, at last, the state must present its compelling state interest in denying marriage licenses to same-sex couples. HERMP will argue against any such interests. We are confident that there are none. Aloha! Tom Ramsey Secretary HERMP Steering Committee