COMPREHENSIVE PROPOSAL FOR LIFTING THE BAN ON GAY, LESBIAN AND BISEXUAL SERVICEMEMBERS IN THE UNITED STATES MILITARY PROPOSAL SUMMARY 1. No Discrimination Based Upon Status: The mere acknowledgment of being a gay person should not be a basis for precluding that individual from serving in the armed forces, even when the person's gay status is known to others in the military. 2. No Discrimination Based Upon Private, Consensual Conduct: Private, consensual gay conduct should not be a basis for discharge. It is disingenuous to allow people to stay in the military if they "say" they are gay, but to discharge them if they live out that fact in their private lives. 3. No Prosecution of Private, Consensual Sodomy by Gay or Straight Personnel: Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) prohibits sodomy (oral or anal sex) between people of the same or opposite sex. The military traditionally has not prosecuted private, consensual sodomy between heterosexual adults under Article 125. The same approach should be followed with regard to gay personnel and the Military Prosecutor's Manual should be amended to reflect this approach. Articles 133 and 134 of the UCMJ should also be applied in an evenhanded manner. 4. Apply Sexual Misconduct Regulations in an Even- handed Manner: A strict code regulating sexual misconduct should be developed and enforced across the board. All inappropriate sexual conduct -- such as sexual harassment, fraternization or sex in the barracks -- is detrimental to the military mission, whether practiced by gay or straight personnel. 5. Continue to Discourage Public Displays of Affection On Base and/or in Uniform: Public displays of affection, on base and/or in uniform, have long been prohibited by the military, sometimes by tradition and custom and sometimes by service policy or regulation. This prohibition should continue, with discretion in application left to the base commander as has traditionally been the case. A special rule prohibiting public displays of affection by gay personnel is unnecessary and should not be established. 6. Make "Whole" Any Service Person Discharged or Disciplined for Gay Status or Private Gay Conduct During the Clinton Administration: President Clinton stated that such individuals would be "made whole." Reliance on such a position led some persons to acknowledge their gay status or to admit to private gay conduct. Such individuals, as well as individuals currently in litigation, should be reinstated to their positions with seniority and receive backpay, if no aggravating circumstances existed in their discharges. 7. Personnel Who Were Discharged, or Resigned in Lieu of Separation (Without Aggravating Circumstances) Prior to the Clinton Administration Should Have the Right to be Reinstated: Compensation of these individuals for the injury suffered should occur through the application of maximum good-faith efforts to place these individuals in desirable positions for which they are qualified. 8. Non-discrimination in the Application of Privacy Rights: All military personnel have a legitimate right not to be harassed or threatened with inappropriate sexual conduct. Sexual harassment, including sexual propositioning, should be severely restricted, whether engaged in by gay or straight personnel. Discomfort in living arrangements, while felt by some straight personnel, is not a sufficient factor to prohibit an entire class of individuals from serving in the military. Such discomfort should be managed and mitigated by good military leadership. 9. Base Commander Discretion Should Continue to be Applied with Regard to First Amendment Rights: Gay support groups may be permitted to organize in the military to the extent that other support groups have been permitted to organize, subject to the discretion of the base commander. The courts have consistently allowed the military to limit speech deemed detrimental to good order and morale. 10. Provision of Benefits Should Follow Existing Federal Agency Policies: No federal agency currently provides benefits to partners of gay employees. No changes in military benefits will occur upon the lifting of the ban. Realistically, any benefit changes will occur only if such changes are made for the federal workforce as a whole. * * * * Prepared by the Legal/Policy Department of the Campaign for Military Service. 2707 Massachussetts Ave, NW Washington, DC 20009. (202) 265-6666.